Ln2 Let's talk
SOLUTIONS · ONE METHODOLOGY, 22 FIELDS OF APPLICATION

A 32-to-1 bill, for diagnosing right.

A clogged filter forces the compressor to work harder. The compressor looks broken; the filter is the culprit. Getting it right instead of wrong, in this example documented in the ARRASTRE patent, was the difference between $375 and $12,000.

PRIORITIZE SYMPTOM
Compressor
$12,000
The victim. An expensive, useless repair: the filter is still dirty.
PRIORITIZE CAUSE · LN2
Filter
$375
The real culprit. Solves the problem at the root.

32:1 is the extreme example documented in the ARRASTRE patent — not a deployment case measured in industry · the typical range is 2:1 to 15:1

THE PROBLEM

Failures don't happen one at a time. They spread.

Heat, vibration, pressure or current propagate wear from one part to its neighbor. Most current systems treat each component as if it existed alone in the world.

+20 pts

Top-1 root-cause accuracy under noise, and up to 10× lower catastrophe rate, versus classic threshold/CBM. Internal benchmark on a synthetic corpus (31 cases × 7 conditions × 30 Monte Carlo runs) — illustrative, not an independent trial.

30–50%

of industrial maintenance interventions today target the wrong component.

$2,000–$50,000

is the cost of every hour of unplanned downtime, depending on the asset.

VERSUS WHAT ALREADY EXISTS

What we solve that other systems don't.

Sensors and alarms

TODAY

They tell you something is wrong, not the cause. Every part is treated in isolation.

WITH LN2

A single number points to the guilty component, with the contagion discounted.

Black-box AI

TODAY

Sometimes it's right, but you can't audit why. Inadmissible under IEC 61508 or 62443.

WITH LN2

Deterministic and traceable. Every decision is explained step by step and can be certified.

Classic control

TODAY

Governs the machine as if it were still new. Chases an optimum that no longer exists.

WITH LN2

Resets the target to the equipment's real state. Diagnoses and controls in the same loop.

Want to see it against specific tools — CMMS, vibration routes, predictive maintenance AI, digital twin? See the full comparison →

WHERE IT APPLIES

Sixteen industrial verticals, twenty-two fields of application. One mathematical core.

Only the physics of contagion changes. The structure of the method is identical across every sector.

Marine & Water

1 REAL

Avoids shutting down a pumping station over a wrong diagnosis.

12 CASES · 1,687 PATHOLOGIES

Energy

1 REAL

Keeps solar inverter performance up as it ages.

9 CASES · 999 PATHOLOGIES

Telecommunications

Prioritizes which network node needs attention first.

6 CASES · 1,501 PATHOLOGIES

Transportation & Mobility

Anticipates fleet failure before service stops.

9 CASES · 1,052 PATHOLOGIES

Manufacturing & Robotics

5 REAL

Tells apart a genuine fault from an induced one on the production line.

14 CASES · 1,502 PATHOLOGIES

Pharma / GMP

Avoids interrupting a production batch over a wrong diagnosis in a clean room.

1 CASE · 36 PATHOLOGIES

Infrastructure & Aggregates

Detects structural wear before catastrophic failure.

7 CASES · 1,133 PATHOLOGIES

Mining

Anticipates failure in ore grinding before the process line stops.

8 CASES · 190 PATHOLOGIES

HVAC & Climate Control

Avoids replacing the compressor when the filter is the culprit.

10 CASES · 1,440 PATHOLOGIES

Aerospace & UAV

1 REAL

Anticipates end-of-life for critical flight components.

9 CASES · 2,713 PATHOLOGIES

Critical Healthcare

Protects the availability of essential medical equipment.

4 CASES · 651 PATHOLOGIES

Rail

1 REAL

Diagnoses axle and bearing before an in-service failure.

5 CASES · 647 PATHOLOGIES

Meat Processing Robotics

Reduces unplanned downtime on the cutting line.

12 CASES · 244 PATHOLOGIES

Industrial Operations

Finds the true bottleneck in a full process.

10 CASES · 179 PATHOLOGIES

NASA + PHM · validation

10 REAL

Validates the method against NASA run-to-failure test benches (bearings, turbofan, battery).

18 CASES · 147 PATHOLOGIES

Academic benchmarks · MIT

6 REAL

Tests the diagnosis against reference academic benchmarks from MIT.

6 CASES · 39 PATHOLOGIES

Cases marked REAL run on actual physical measurement, not simulation alone.

MORE CASES · WITH THE MISSES SHOWN TOO

We diagnose the cause, not the symptom. When the method wins, we show it. When it doesn't, too.

AVIONICS BAY · UTA

Clears the operator against a real incident file

On a real operational incident, it isolates the CTRL-MODE root cause (a stuck setpoint) with the highest dominance in the corpus — matching the engineering record, and the second fault surfaces on its own.

TENNESSEE EASTMAN · CHEMICAL PROCESS

6 of 12, stated plainly

Recovers the faults that are localizable and observable — including the condenser fault masked by the control loop — and declares, plainly, where it fails on the distributed ones.

IMS BEARING · NASA

Isolates the cause among 4 bearings

The naive detector flags all 4 bearings on the shaft as suspect. Ln2's decoupling isolates B1, the documented root cause.

MILLING

Confirms tool wear

The root cause identified by the method matches the test bench's real tool-wear label.

ZeMA HYDRAULIC RIG

A tie, stated plainly

With 4 well-instrumented components, the method ties with naive diagnosis (90.5% vs. 92.9%). We don't claim an advantage the data doesn't support.

That our hits and our misses fall exactly where our own premises predict doesn't weaken the comparison — it confirms our map of limits is real.

AVAILABLE TODAY

Three ways to get started.

OPTION 01

Validation pilot

We apply the method to one of your critical assets. You bring the case; we bring the technology and the analysis.

OPTION 02

Technology license

Our patent portfolio, available for integration into your products or process lines.

OPTION 03

Strategic co-development

For large industrial or defense projects. We work as an R&D partner, not a vendor.

IN DEVELOPMENT · ROADMAP

Continuous twin

Real-time monitoring, with a closed control loop, on the customer's own asset. Today it isn't a purchasable product: there's no onboarding backend, no ingestion from plant systems, and no pricing set. If you're interested, let's talk about how it fits your roadmap.

Not sure which one fits your case?

Tell us about it and we'll give you a straight answer.

Contact us